Answer readiness
Direct answers, Q&A patterns, heading structure, lists, tables and extractability.
Direct answers, Q&A patterns, heading structure, lists, tables and extractability.
Entity clarity, citations, authorship, evidence, schema and machine-readable trust signals.
Optional OpenRouter analysis for answerability, information gain and citation-worthiness.
Fetching HTML and technical signals
Checks that most affect AEO and GEO readiness.
How easily can a search or answer system identify the page topic, find a direct answer, and extract it with enough context?
How clearly does the page expose entities, evidence, citations, authorship and reusable factual passages for generative retrieval systems?
The audit combines deterministic page checks with optional semantic AI review. It does not claim that a page ranks in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Google AI features. Real visibility requires repeated live-query testing.
AEO Score measures answer structure and machine-readable readiness. GEO Score measures entity/evidence/citability readiness. AI Readiness appears only when OpenRouter analysis succeeds.
AEO & GEO Insights helps you evaluate whether a web page is easy for answer engines, search systems and generative retrieval tools to understand and reuse. Enter any public URL to review answer structure, entity clarity, citations, authorship, schema, crawlability and technical signals, then use the diagnostic report to prioritize fixes.
AEO focuses on making a page easy to interpret as a direct answer. Clear headings, concise definitions, question-and-answer patterns, lists, tables and contextual passages all improve answer extractability.
GEO focuses on reusable factual information: clear entities, evidence, citations, authorship, structured data and passages that can stand on their own when a generative system retrieves them.
Neither AEO nor GEO replaces technical SEO. Search engines still need a crawlable, indexable page with sensible metadata, canonical URLs, structured data and accessible content before discovery can happen reliably.
The audit looks for direct-answer patterns, headings, lists and tables; identifies schema and entity signals; checks authorship, dates, citations and numerical evidence; reviews robots and indexability signals; and surfaces technical issues that can prevent a page from being understood correctly. When semantic AI review is enabled, it can also evaluate answerability, extractability, information gain and citation-worthiness. The score is a diagnostic readiness score—not a claim that a page already ranks in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Google AI features.
| Area | AEO | GEO |
|---|---|---|
| Primary goal | Make answers easy to identify and extract | Make information easy to retrieve, verify and cite |
| Strong signals | Direct answers, Q&A, headings, lists, tables | Entities, sources, evidence, authorship, schema |
| Shared foundation | Crawlability, indexability, useful content, clear semantics and trustworthy information | |
No. SEO covers the broader process of making pages discoverable and competitive in search. AEO is a narrower layer focused on structuring content so an answer system can identify and extract a useful response quickly.
No. A readiness score can identify signals associated with clear, citable content, but real AI visibility depends on the retrieval system, query, index freshness, competition and repeated live-query behavior.
You can audit public URLs that the server can fetch. Pages protected by authentication, private networks or restrictive anti-bot controls may not be accessible to the checker.
Read the audit methodology · Read the AEO vs GEO guide · About AEO & GEO Insights